The Kush friendly brand is focused on quality and standing up in the fight against the misguided culture of cannabis prohibition. The focus is not so much the question of why people have this culture, but rather why it persists. It began as a side issue in the deliberations of the League of Nations' Opium focus in the 20s of the last century, the ban is maintained through the years and why this is makes no sense.
It will not take a lot to convince you that the only thing relevant to cannabis prohibition, is the prohibition itself and its survival, rather than the stories that are told about cannabis and its dangers. During a certain time, why the ban originated, and which authorities stood to benefit from it in any way, is of course important, and also nice to give you some background on the issue. You can instantly realize that the New York Police Department benefits from it, for example.
The core of the argument is that cannabis prohibition has a status that is free from rational and functional assessments. Cannabis prohibition is the reason for its own existence, and fulfills spiritual needs of a different nature than that for which it was founded. It is important to keep scientific facts in mind when discussing the issue.
The alleged dangers of cannabis have not been proven in a lab yet, on the basis of what some researchers have discovered. These are experts from Sweden, France and England. People the world over are talking about what they think these dangers are understood as in their own countries.
The English tend to be was much shorter in their answer to being asked why prohibition continues with them, simply not wishing to get into details. None of them, not even the smartest can claim that their statements are scientifically tenable. They just simply say that cannabis is 'just bad' for people, in all sorts of ways, and also widely seen as a step towards the use of other drugs.
The story is the same when you look at the sacredness of cannabis prohibition. This applies to its connection to "purifying" and the belief in it. The fact that it eludes ordinary considerations of scientific, economic or social nature is simply ignored.
Another interesting observation about the nature of the stories about the dangers of this innocent (and proven to have cause no deaths in the last 2 decades and more) plant can be found in a famous article by Jerome Himmelstein. The work was called 'From weed killer to drop out drug'. The author describes the relatively short period of the existence of the cannabis ban in the U. S., and the way that the powers that be justify it.
Levine concludes from numerous interviews that there are a number of benefits to the NYC cannabis arrests. It delivers very high production figures. The police needed a style of management, for which statistics of 'production' are required. It also provides police officers with a much-needed overtime, through relatively easy and risk-free work. Stand up for what you know to be true and wear quality garments, showing your support for truth.
It will not take a lot to convince you that the only thing relevant to cannabis prohibition, is the prohibition itself and its survival, rather than the stories that are told about cannabis and its dangers. During a certain time, why the ban originated, and which authorities stood to benefit from it in any way, is of course important, and also nice to give you some background on the issue. You can instantly realize that the New York Police Department benefits from it, for example.
The core of the argument is that cannabis prohibition has a status that is free from rational and functional assessments. Cannabis prohibition is the reason for its own existence, and fulfills spiritual needs of a different nature than that for which it was founded. It is important to keep scientific facts in mind when discussing the issue.
The alleged dangers of cannabis have not been proven in a lab yet, on the basis of what some researchers have discovered. These are experts from Sweden, France and England. People the world over are talking about what they think these dangers are understood as in their own countries.
The English tend to be was much shorter in their answer to being asked why prohibition continues with them, simply not wishing to get into details. None of them, not even the smartest can claim that their statements are scientifically tenable. They just simply say that cannabis is 'just bad' for people, in all sorts of ways, and also widely seen as a step towards the use of other drugs.
The story is the same when you look at the sacredness of cannabis prohibition. This applies to its connection to "purifying" and the belief in it. The fact that it eludes ordinary considerations of scientific, economic or social nature is simply ignored.
Another interesting observation about the nature of the stories about the dangers of this innocent (and proven to have cause no deaths in the last 2 decades and more) plant can be found in a famous article by Jerome Himmelstein. The work was called 'From weed killer to drop out drug'. The author describes the relatively short period of the existence of the cannabis ban in the U. S., and the way that the powers that be justify it.
Levine concludes from numerous interviews that there are a number of benefits to the NYC cannabis arrests. It delivers very high production figures. The police needed a style of management, for which statistics of 'production' are required. It also provides police officers with a much-needed overtime, through relatively easy and risk-free work. Stand up for what you know to be true and wear quality garments, showing your support for truth.
No comments:
Post a Comment